QUESTION: Is one truly creative if they require some sort of narcotic or drug to "bring it out"?
It would be awesome and preferable if you left your comments on this page! Soliiiid.
1/17/13
DEBATE QUESTION: Jump on in!
I've decided you'll be finding feisty little debate questions popping up from time to time. Ya'll are 'bout to be so engaged! Please, refrain from bombarding me with thanks when seen in the streets. Here goes ;)
QUESTION: Is one truly creative if they require some sort of narcotic or drug to "bring it out"?
It would be awesome and preferable if you left your comments on this page! Soliiiid.
QUESTION: Is one truly creative if they require some sort of narcotic or drug to "bring it out"?
It would be awesome and preferable if you left your comments on this page! Soliiiid.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Of course!
ReplyDeleteSure the substance may change the person, but the substance isn't the source that is making possibly making profound art.
Is an artist with chemical imbalances of the brain any less of an artist? Besides the fact that chemical imbalance is essentially what drugs do to you; lots of people with issues of the mind resort to substance abuse.
A lot of critics think Coltrane's stuff was better when he was fucked up. But of course he did make A Love Supreme when he was sober .
Cool topic ;)
Thanks for the input, Brian! Wish we coulda got some more input on this one. But you have some really valid points.
Delete